New: CentriCall AI voice agents that answer, qualify, and book around the clock
Centricone Technologies
Centricone Technologies forHealthcare

HIPAA-compliant healthcare software development and EHR integration

Centricone Technologies builds patient-facing and clinical software for providers and health-tech companies across North America — telehealth platforms, patient portals, and the HL7 v2 and FHIR integrations that connect them to the EHR.

Book a free consultationExplore our services

Compliance is an architecture decision, not a document written at the end. PHI handling, access control, and audit logging are designed in from the first sprint.

24/7

support coverage across US and Canada time zones

100%

of code reviewed, tested, and documented before release

Healthcare software fails at the seams, not in the features

01

The EHR won't give up its data

Clinical data sits behind HL7 v2 feeds, proprietary APIs, and interface engines, so every new product starts with months of integration work.

02

Compliance arrives too late

PHI handling, encryption, and audit trails get retrofitted after a build, which costs more and still leaves gaps a security review will find.

03

Clinicians won't use what slows them down

Tools that add clicks to a shift get abandoned, no matter how well the underlying platform performs.

Centricone Technologies delivers the full stack: HIPAA-aligned application development, EHR and EMR integration, cloud infrastructure with PHI-safe configuration, and ongoing support.

Build

Custom healthcare software, built HIPAA-ready

Explore software development

Secure

Cloud, security, and support for PHI workloads

Explore cloud and DevOps
John-Paul Riordan
Talk to our team

How a healthcare build runs with Centricone Technologies

Discovery covers clinical workflow, data flows, and PHI boundaries before any code. Architecture and a security model come next, then delivery in increments your clinical stakeholders review as they land.

Talk to our team
1
security model, agreed before the first sprint

Why healthcare teams choose Centricone Technologies

HIPAA and PHI handling designed in, not retrofitted

Real HL7 v2 and FHIR integration experience

Clinical workflow shapes the build, not the other way around

US and Canada delivery with documented handover

What healthcare clients get out of it

Integration that holds

EHR feeds with validation, retries, and monitoring, so clinical data arrives complete instead of arriving eventually.

Audit-ready by default

Access and change logs on every PHI touch

Adoption clinicians accept

Fewer clicks in the workflows that matter

Faster patient access

Scheduling and intake without the phone queue

Lower integration risk

Standards changes handled on a schedule

Who we build healthcare software for

  • Provider groups and clinics

    Patient portals, scheduling, and intake tooling connected to the EHR you already run.

  • Health-tech and digital health startups

    Product builds that pass security review — HIPAA architecture, FHIR APIs, and infrastructure ready for a first enterprise customer.

  • Payers and benefits administrators

    Claims, eligibility, and member portals built around the integrations and reporting the business runs on.

  • Labs, pharmacy, and diagnostics

    Order and results interfaces, device data pipelines, and portals for the clinicians who depend on them.

Healthcare development questions, answered

We build to HIPAA requirements: PHI encrypted in transit and at rest, least-privilege access, full audit logging, and infrastructure under a signed BAA with the cloud provider. Compliance is a shared responsibility, so we also hand over the documentation and runbooks your own program needs.
Yes. We work with HL7 v2 feeds, FHIR APIs, and interface engines, and we build the mapping, validation, retry, and monitoring layers around them so a dropped message is caught rather than discovered later in a chart.
Yes — scheduling, secure messaging, video visits, intake forms, and billing hooks, with the security model agreed before the first sprint. If an existing platform gets you there faster, we will say so and integrate with it instead.
Yes. We serve both the US and Canada, and we design data residency, consent, and access controls against the regime that applies to you — HIPAA, PIPEDA, or provincial rules such as PHIPA.
Yes. Where we handle protected health information on your behalf, a BAA is a legal requirement rather than a courtesy, and we sign one before any such data is in scope. If an engagement can be structured so we never touch PHI at all, we will propose that first, because the safest data is the data we do not hold.
Yes, and most healthcare integration work still involves both. FHIR is the direction of travel and the better target for anything new; HL7 v2 is what the installed base actually speaks, and a realistic project usually bridges the two rather than choosing one.
It does not go there. Test environments get synthetic or de-identified data, because a copy of production in a developer's environment is the most common way health data leaks and the hardest to defend afterwards. Where a bug can only be reproduced against real data, that happens under access controls and with a record of who looked.
Longer than the equivalent build in an unregulated sector, and the difference is not the code. Integration access to an EHR, security review, and validation add time that is outside your control, so we sequence those requests at the start of the project rather than when the software is ready for them.