Cloud and DevOps as one engagement, not two projects
Moving to the cloud without changing how you release gets you a more expensive version of the same problem. This engagement does both: the architecture and the migration, and the pipelines, environments, and monitoring that make the result something your team can operate.
Infrastructure and delivery fail together and have to be fixed together. Buying them as one engagement is the difference between a migration that lands and one that stalls at the cutover.
support coverage across US and Canada time zones
of code reviewed, tested, and documented before release
The migration finished and nothing got easier
New platform, old process
Workloads run in the cloud and deploys are still manual, still at night, still with a checklist and a bridge call.
Two vendors, one seam
One team owns the infrastructure and another owns the pipeline, and the failures land exactly between them.
Nobody can operate the result
The migration was done to you rather than with you, and the knowledge left when the engagement ended.
for teams changing platform and practice at once
Centricone runs the assessment, the landing zone, the migration, the pipelines, and the observability as a single plan, with your team taking over as it goes.
Deliverables
What you get
- A landing zone and infrastructure defined in Terraform
- Workloads migrated in waves, each with a rollback path
- CI/CD pipelines with preview environments
- Dashboards, alerting, and runbooks
- Cost tagging, budgets, and a spend review cadence
- Your team operating it before we leave
How the engagement runs
Assess both sides
The estate and the delivery path, in one exercise, ending in a sequenced plan and a written estimate.
Landing zone and first pipeline
Guardrails and one end-to-end automated path, proven on the lowest-risk workload.
Wave by wave
Workloads in dependency order, each arriving with automation, monitoring, and a way back.
Hand over the operating model
Your engineers on the tools, runbooks written, and an agreed support arrangement if you want one.
When to buy the pieces separately instead
This engagement exists because the two problems usually arrive together. When they do not, buy the one you actually have.
- You are already in the cloud and only the release process hurts — buy DevOps services on their own.
- You need architecture and migration but already have strong delivery practice — buy cloud solutions on their own.
- The pain is really cost rather than platform. A focused cloud cost audit is cheaper and faster.
- You need capacity inside your existing platform team, not an engagement beside it — that is staff augmentation.
Why teams buy the two together
One plan, one team, no seam between platform and delivery
Every wave arrives with automation, not after it
Infrastructure as code from the first account
Handover to your team is a deliverable, not a hope
Prefer to buy just one half?
Cloud solutions covers assessment, landing zone, migration, and cost work on its own. DevOps services covers pipelines, infrastructure as code, containers, and observability on its own. This page is the engagement that runs both as one plan.
Frequently asked questions
Not sure this is the right shape? Tell us the situation and we’ll say which engagement fits.