SaaS platforms built to carry paying customers from the first release
Centricone Technologies builds multi-tenant products: tenant isolation, subscription billing, roles and permissions, audit trails, and the reliability and security work an enterprise buyer will ask about before they sign.
The decisions that are expensive to reverse in SaaS are made in the first month: how tenants are isolated, how billing models change, and how permissions are expressed. We make those deliberately.
support coverage across US and Canada time zones
of code reviewed, tested, and documented before release
The product works. Turning it into a business is the hard part
Tenancy was an afterthought
Customer data is separated by a column and a hopeful WHERE clause, and every new enterprise question about isolation is answered with a promise.
Billing does not match how you sell
Plans changed, seats and usage were added, and the pricing you want to offer now needs a rewrite of the thing that takes the money.
The security review keeps blocking deals
SSO, audit logs, role granularity, and data-retention answers are all missing at exactly the moment a large customer asks.
for teams selling software to businesses
Centricone covers the platform underneath the product: tenancy, identity, billing, permissions, and the operational and security work that keeps enterprise customers.
Deliverables
What you get
- A multi-tenant platform in your own cloud accounts
- Billing wired to your pricing, with plan changes as configuration
- SSO, roles, permissions, and an audit log
- Load-test results against your expected peak
- Infrastructure as code and a deployment pipeline
- Architecture decision records and runbooks
How a platform engagement runs
Model the business, then the schema
How you sell, who administers what, and what an enterprise buyer will demand. Tenancy and billing follow from that, not the other way round.
Build the spine first
Tenancy, identity, and billing before feature breadth, because these are the parts that are painful to change once customers exist.
Feature delivery in increments
Working software each sprint against a backlog you own, with tests and pipeline in place from the start.
Harden and hand over
Load tests, security review, runbooks, and either a support agreement or a documented handover to your team.
When a platform build is the wrong engagement
This is the heavier of our engagements, and it is not always the right one first.
- You have not yet proven anyone will pay — build an MVP and find out before paying for tenancy you may not need.
- You have one large customer and no second one in sight. That is a custom application, and pretending otherwise adds cost.
- An existing platform mostly works and needs strengthening rather than replacing — start with an audit under maintenance and support.
- The requirement is really integration between systems you already run, not a new product.
Why teams choose Centricone for SaaS platforms
Tenancy and billing decided deliberately, in writing
Enterprise requirements designed in, not retrofitted
Load tested against the peak you actually expect
You own the platform, the cloud accounts, and the code
Frequently asked questions
Not sure this is the right shape? Tell us the situation and we’ll say which engagement fits.

