AI agents that do the work, not just describe it
Centricone Technologies builds agents that act: reading from and writing to the systems you already run, following a process you defined, stopping at the approvals you set, and logging every step so you can see what happened and why.
An agent is judged on the actions it takes when nobody is watching. We define the tools it can reach, the approvals it must stop for, and the blast radius of its worst possible step — before it runs against production.
support coverage across US and Canada time zones
of code reviewed, tested, and documented before release
The demo automated one task. The business runs on twenty
It can answer, but it cannot act
The assistant summarises the ticket and drafts the reply, and a person still opens four systems to do the actual work. The reading was never the expensive part.
Nobody will let it touch production
Without scoped credentials, approval gates, and a reversible action log, no owner signs off on letting a model write to the system of record — and they are right not to.
It works until the process changes
The automation was wired to a screen layout or a prompt that assumed last quarter's process, and it fails silently the week the process moves.
for teams automating work that spans systems
Centricone covers the whole agent: the process it follows, the tools and integrations it can reach, the approvals and guardrails around it, and the evaluation and monitoring that keep it trustworthy once it is live.
Deliverables
What you get
- A live agent running a process you defined
- Tool definitions, each with its own scoped credentials
- Approval gates on every consequential action
- An action log you can read and replay
- A scored evaluation set, in your repository
- Traces, cost reporting, and alerting per run
How an agent engagement runs
Map the process and pick the split
What the task actually involves, where the exceptions are, and which steps an agent should own. Ends with a written scope and an estimate.
Wire the tools before the reasoning
Integrations, credentials, and limits first, so the agent has a safe surface to act on before it is asked to decide anything.
Run shadowed, then gated
The agent proposes and a person approves, on real work, until the evaluation set says the proposals are good enough to widen.
Widen the mandate on evidence
Approval gates lifted step by step where the record supports it, and left exactly where it does not.
When an agent is the wrong build
Agentic AI is the most over-sold category in this market. We would rather scope you into something smaller that works.
- The task is deterministic and well specified — a script or a workflow tool will be cheaper, faster, and more reliable than a model.
- What you need is answers from your own documents rather than actions in your systems. That is an enterprise AI assistant.
- The work is pulling structured fields out of documents at volume. That is document intelligence, and it is a different build.
- The underlying systems have no usable API and no appetite for one. Fix the integration problem first — an agent cannot route around it.
Why teams build agents with Centricone
The process mapped before the prompt is written
Scoped credentials and approval gates by default
A scored evaluation set that you own
Every action logged, readable, and replayable
The capability behind this engagement
Model selection and evaluation, retrieval, guardrails, logging, and the cost controls that decide whether a pilot becomes a product — covered in more depth on the AI development services page.
Frequently asked questions
Not sure this is the right shape? Tell us the situation and we’ll say which engagement fits.

