CI/CD and continuous delivery consulting
Most teams that call a CI/CD consultant do not have a pipeline problem. They have a delivery problem that the pipeline has made visible — a test suite nobody trusts, environments assembled by hand, a release that needs three people awake. We work on the whole path from commit to customer, because fixing the middle of it in isolation moves the queue rather than clearing it.
Where the time actually goes
A faster pipeline does not make a slow team fast
Build minutes are the cheapest thing to optimise and almost never the constraint. The constraint is usually a batch size nobody has questioned, a manual approval that exists because a change broke something in 2021, or a suite so flaky that a red build is read as noise. We start by finding which of those is actually binding, and we say so even when the answer is that your pipeline is fine.
Scope
What a CI/CD engagement covers
Delivery assessment against the four keys
Deployment frequency, lead time for changes, change failure rate, and time to restore — DORA's four keys, measured from your own version control and deployment history rather than from a survey. It takes a week and it is the only way to know whether a change helped.
Branching and batch size
Long-lived branches are the most common root cause we find and the least commonly suspected. Moving toward trunk-based development with feature flags is usually a bigger win than any pipeline change, and it is also the hardest sell, so we make the case with your own merge data.
Test strategy the pipeline can rely on
A gate is only a gate if a red result stops the line. That means quarantining flaky tests rather than tolerating them, putting the slow suites where they do not block feedback, and being explicit about what each stage is actually asserting.
Deployment strategy and rollback
Blue/green, canary, or rolling — chosen against your traffic shape, your data migrations, and what you can actually observe. Rollback is designed first, because a deploy you cannot reverse is a deploy nobody wants to do on a Friday.
Pipeline security and supply chain
Secrets out of the pipeline definition, least-privilege runners, dependency and image scanning as gates rather than reports, and build provenance where a customer or auditor asks for it. This is where CI/CD work and SOC 2 evidence overlap.
Handover, so the practice outlives the engagement
Runbooks, an on-call rotation your team owns, and pipeline definitions in your repository under your review process. A consultant who leaves behind a system only they understand has sold you a dependency.
Moving between CI platforms
Platform migrations are a large share of this work, and they are rarely just a translation of one YAML dialect into another. The pipeline that exists usually encodes years of undocumented decisions, and the honest first step is separating the ones that still matter from the ones nobody has questioned since.
- Jenkins to GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or Azure Pipelines — usually driven by the cost of maintaining controllers and plugins
- Self-hosted to managed runners, with the network and secrets access that actually blocks it worked out before the cutover
- Consolidating several teams' pipelines onto shared, versioned workflows without turning them into a platform team's bottleneck
- Running old and new in parallel until the new one has earned trust, rather than cutting over on a date
Tooling
What we work in
Pipelines
- GitHub Actions
- GitLab CI
- Azure Pipelines
- Jenkins
- CircleCI
- Argo CD
- Flux
Infrastructure and delivery
- Terraform
- Pulumi
- Helm
- Kubernetes
- Docker
- AWS CodeDeploy
Quality and supply chain
- SonarQube
- Trivy
- Snyk
- Playwright
- Testcontainers
- Sigstore

