New: CentriCall AI voice agents that answer, qualify, and book around the clock
Cloud Solutions forFinance

Cloud migration for financial services, with the evidence built in

Financial institutions do not get to move first and document later. Residency, key custody, retention, and recovery objectives are all decided in the design phase, because that is what the examination will ask about.

What changes here

Cloud Solutions in finance is not the same engagement

Key custody decided, not defaulted

Provider-managed, customer-managed, or hardware-backed keys chosen deliberately per data class, with rotation and separation of duties written down.

Retention that cannot be quietly altered

Where records must be preserved in non-rewritable form, object lock and legal hold are configured as part of the landing zone rather than added after an audit finding.

Recovery objectives tied to the business day

RTO and RPO set against settlement windows and market hours rather than against a generic target, then proved by rehearsed restores.

What the regime actually requires

Outsourcing to a cloud provider does not outsource accountability. Regulators expect the same control and evidence you would hold in your own data centre, plus a documented exit path.

  • Non-rewritable, non-erasable retention where SEC Rule 17a-4 applies
  • GLBA safeguards over customer financial information, including vendor access review
  • Documented concentration risk and an exit plan, in the spirit of regulator outsourcing guidance
  • PCI DSS scope kept deliberately small where card data is in play

Assessment, landing zone, and target architecture

An inventory of what you run, a dependency map, and a landing zone with accounts, networking, identity, and guardrails set up before the first workload moves.

Migration and modernization in waves

Applications moved in dependency order — rehost where it earns nothing to change, re-architect to managed services and containers where it pays for itself.

Cloud-native application development

Serverless and container workloads, managed databases, queues, and event-driven services built for the platform rather than ported onto it.

FinOps and cost optimization

Tagging, budgets and alerts, rightsizing, savings plans, and idle-resource cleanup — spend attributed to a team and a service, reviewed monthly.

Resilience, backup, and tested recovery

Multi-AZ design, backup policy, and restores actually rehearsed against an agreed RTO and RPO instead of assumed.

Observability and cloud security posture

Metrics, logs, and traces in one place, with IAM least privilege, encryption, and posture checks running continuously rather than at audit time.

Finance questions we get asked

Something more specific? Send us the situation and we’ll answer it straight.

This is routine now, provided you can evidence control: where data sits, who can reach it, how it is retained, and how you would exit. The work is producing that evidence as a by-product of the architecture rather than as a separate exercise.
Usually not, and it is expensive. What examiners generally want is a documented understanding of the risk and a credible exit path — which infrastructure as code and portable data formats give you far more cheaply than running everything twice.
By keeping card data out of your systems wherever possible — tokenization and provider-hosted payment fields — and segmenting whatever remains. Scope reduction is the cheapest compliance work available and the migration is the moment to do it.