New: CentriCall AI voice agents that answer, qualify, and book around the clock
IT Staffing forEnterprise

Enterprise IT staff augmentation, inside your process and your audit trail

Enterprise augmentation succeeds or fails on onboarding. An engineer who cannot get access, or who works outside your change process, produces risk rather than capacity.

What changes here

IT Staffing in enterprise is not the same engagement

Onboarded to your SDLC, not ours

Your repositories, your branching model, your change control, your definition of done. We adapt to the process you are audited against rather than importing our own.

Screening and paperwork handled up front

Background checks, IP assignment, and confidentiality terms completed before day one, so procurement and legal are not the reason a start date slips.

Knowledge that stays after the contract

Documentation and handover are part of the engagement, so capacity does not walk out of the door with the contractor at the end of the term.

The constraints that actually shape these engagements

Enterprise contracting has requirements that have nothing to do with engineering ability, and ignoring them is what delays starts by weeks.

  • Background screening and, where relevant, drug or credit checks completed before access is granted
  • Clear IP assignment and confidentiality terms covering contractor-produced work
  • Access provisioning through your identity process, with least privilege and an off-boarding trigger
  • Compliance with your contingent-worker classification and tenure policies

Proof

Who already trusts us with production systems

Enterprise buyers are not choosing between approaches — every vendor describes the same one. They are choosing between vendors who have worked at their scale and vendors who have not. These are our clients, not a stock logo belt, and the two engagements below are written up in full.

  • Delta Air Lines
  • Cox Communications
  • Thomson Reuters
  • Capgemini
  • Cognizant
  • Accenture
  • Texas Workforce Commission
  • Ohio Department of Job & Family Services

The work itself

Full it staffing page

Contract and contract-to-hire

Engineers embedded in your team, on your board and in your repository, with a defined path to permanent if the fit is right.

Managed delivery pods

A small team with its own lead, accountable for an outcome rather than for hours — useful when you need capacity but not another set of people to manage.

Direct hire and permanent search

Full search for roles you intend to keep, with the same technical assessment applied before anyone reaches your interview loop.

Onboarding and standards

Our engineers work to the same review, testing, and documentation standards as our delivery teams, so what they leave behind is maintainable.

Coverage and continuity

Named backup for critical roles and a documented handover if someone rolls off, so knowledge does not walk out with a contract end date.

Regular check-ins

Scheduled reviews with you and with the engineer, so a mismatch is fixed in week two rather than at the end of the quarter.

Enterprise questions we get asked

Something more specific? Send us the situation and we’ll answer it straight.

Screening, replacement, and continuity. Candidates are technically assessed by engineers before you see them, there is a named backup for critical roles, and if someone is not the right fit we replace rather than leave you to restart a search.
Where the role genuinely requires it we discuss it case by case. Most enterprise engagements run remote with working-hours overlap, which is what our staffing model is built around.
Through your own identity and provisioning process, at least privilege, with off-boarding triggered by the contract end date rather than by someone remembering. We ask for that trigger to be in the agreement.
The engineers are our employees or contracted through us, we run payroll and benefits, and the commercial relationship is with Centricone rather than with an individual. That is the structure your legal team will want to see. We are happy to go through it with them before an engagement starts rather than at renewal.
Yes, and that shape suits this model better than a steady-state team does. We agree the ramp and the wind-down at the start, with notice periods attached, so the reduction is a scheduled event. Programmes that staff up without agreeing the exit are the ones where the last quarter becomes an awkward negotiation.
Yes — your repository, your board, your review process, your standups. We do not run a parallel process or report progress through a separate channel, because the value of augmentation disappears the moment the work has to be translated between two systems of record.